Patsy Kensit
- Thread starter scoobysue
- Start date
sookie
Silver Member
I'm at a total loss when any company used a "face" to primate their products.. Do these companies really think that Jo public believes that Cheryl Cole and Davina stay home and dye their hair..don't get me started on the face creams...
But getting back to Patsy to me she looks thinner inside the book than on the cover. X
But getting back to Patsy to me she looks thinner inside the book than on the cover. X
knittyflitty
Full Member
I think she looks awful, to be honest. The airbrushing on the photos is really bad. Actually all 3 of the celebs look bad in their photos on the website. WW need to hire a better photographer and digital editor!
I haven't looked on the website but in the aubergine dress she definetly looks like she got full body spanx on which i don't think is very fair and like all of us she would still have a waist with small bulges even with her 14.5 lbs of, not like she is 10% bodyfat is it....something just doesn't seem right
SimplyFilling
Full Member
They should just use real people who have done the diet, it's proof enough.
I bet she never even followed ww
I bet she never even followed ww
samsmum1
Silver Member
I think that they think that if the diet,s good enough for 'celebs' then why aren,t us mere mortals all following it?! Shame on us! Lol!
Sal x
sookie
Silver Member
Your probably right there... I must run out and buy some L'Oreal I if it keeps all these celebs face wrinkle free it must work... It's a wonder we have any plastic surgeons left... ;-) x
superclaire999
Full Member
Hi, when I saw her in the redish dress in the mail I read that she was 10'2 and thought she looked great and started getting all my old ww books out, read it again and she says she's 9'4!! I think I could realistically get to 10 but not 9, but I started the diet anyway
bolero982
Silver Member
Personally I think that if WW can afford to pay a group of celebrities to do all this advertising ('cause lets face it, they're not doing it for nowt), then they're making too much money and should cut the cost of doing WW instead. Would have a bigger impact on encouraging people to sign up, if you ask me. My two pence worth.
mybodyisacage
Silver Member
You hit the nail on the head there! the only thing stopping me from joining WW or SW is how much it costs to join/weekly fee.
Because Im intelligent, plus its all over the net, I know how to lose weight, so Im not going for some big secret to be revealed to me, more just the sense of community and support. I dont have to pay my friends £30 a month to support me
Because Im intelligent, plus its all over the net, I know how to lose weight, so Im not going for some big secret to be revealed to me, more just the sense of community and support. I dont have to pay my friends £30 a month to support me
SukiRegan
Member
I think everyone is right ....paying for a celebrity endorsement is ridiculous. It shows they make far too much money. I would much rather prefer to see real people and celebrate their success. Its already one of the most popular eating plans out there so I dont know why they needed the three of them!
Similar threads
