BMI question - I may be shot down in flames here......

Discussion in 'Cambridge Weight Plan' started by Sez, 14 June 2008 Social URL.

  1. Sez

    Sez has started again!!

    How much store do you guys set by BMI guidelines? I just wonder as I have almost four stone to lose, if I go according to my height and BMI, but I honestly think that would be too thin for me. I felt great at about 3 stone over my ideal BMI, and I was aiming for that weight less about another stone as my final goal.

    Do you think age makes any significant difference in the BMI range? Is BMI calculated differently for nubile 20 somethings, than it is for exhausted 40+ mothers! LOL!!!

    Just wondered......
  2. Avatar Matched Content

  3. DEvans

    DEvans Full Member

    Sez, I really hate BMI calculations as the weight it wants me to be is way to thin for what I will feel comfortable with so I only use it as a guideline.

    I have a serious gripes with what the BMI stipulates for me. I know how you feel. I am a 20 something female and I don't want to be stick thin either. I am doing CD to get down to a weight that I am comfortable. I am not going to be lumped into an average group of what other people thing I should weigh.

    Sorry rant over....
  4. Dancing

    Dancing Gold Member

    i only go by BMI in terms of on vlcd we shouldn't be ssing once we get to BMI25 or below.

    In terms of if a person should be aiming to get in the "healthy" range. I think BMI is only a guide and can give misleading information. For instance if you have two females of medium build, 5'4, age 30 and both weigh 8 stone 5 ... their BMIs would be the same but it takes no account of the fact that one of the females is an elite athlete with twice the muscle mass of the other female, whom barely manages to walk to the bus stop.

    I know that people look different at different ages and somehow their bodies can look completely different even though their height and weight is the same.

    One thing .. You know that young miss england candidate who is a size 16? Well, she is about my height and says she is a size 16 even though she apparently weighs 12 stone 8 - she looks larger than me and I was a size 12/14 a few months ago when I weighed 13 stone 5. Perhaps this info hasn't been reported correctly but I've noticed it with "real" people. Same stats but look different.

    waffle waffle waffle
  5. Sez

    Sez has started again!!


    Hadnt seen her, but IKWYM! I am around 13 and half stone now, and am wearing mostly size 14s. When I weighed 12 stone , I was easily fitting into 12s...... at my ideal BMI I would be an 8 or below, I reckon!!! Way too thin for me, honest!!
  6. spooky

    spooky Banned

    BMI is pretty much a generalisation based on Joe average of average build who is average age and living in averageville as far as we know!
    When your BMI gets to 25/26 its pretty much generally accepted for a VLCD that you do not have enough stores of fat to continue on SS, and its a guideline marker for moving up the plans.
    To work out calories in terms of maintenance its worth looking at your Basal Metabolic Rate as this figure takes into account your height, age, gender and activity level. Link below.

    Calories Per Day Calculator - Basal Metabolic Rate
  7. Dancing

    Dancing Gold Member

    1868 cals a day if I aimed high (11 stone) instead of 1947 if I went for 12 stone. Not alot of difference in cals to maintain the two weights. Now, if only I could get back into the 13s, the 11 stone might seem achievable :(
  8. Sez

    Sez has started again!!

    For me, if I got to 11 stone it would be 2102 cals per day. Fairly doable I reckon. 9 stone would be 1919cals.....
  9. Dancing

    Dancing Gold Member

    you are clearly years younger than me and/or more active than me
  10. Sez

    Sez has started again!!

    oh bum.... I spotted the activity levels! If I adjust to "lightly active", (I darent do sedentary!!) I will have to just starve.....

    Oh & I am much much older.....44 in fact!
  11. KD

    KD Gone fishing

    Was Cambridge, now maintaining
    Mines only 1800 to maintain:cry:

    Darn nuisance as I find 2,000 much more 'comfortable'

    Not that 1800 is uncomfortable, just 200 calories lower than I'd prefer :D
  12. Dancing

    Dancing Gold Member

    another bonus of moving up the plans on CD I suppose - get to appreciate every little calorie.

    I'll have to take a look at your maintenance diary to see how much food you actually get to eat on 1800 cals.
  13. KD

    KD Gone fishing

    Was Cambridge, now maintaining
    Not much, though like Dancing, I do believe people need to take the BMI 25 rule for SSing seriously, as there's no way to be sure on an individual basis. It's the best we got.

    I really feel that you shouldn't feel any pressure to get to anyone's ideal view of what the correct BMI is. It's your body after all. You know how you feel, what you want to look like...whether you want to look super-skinny, or curvy.

    Personally I don't think 2-3 stone above what is considered 'healthy' is enough to make much of an impact on health anyway.

    The only thing I would say is do experiment a bit. Don't just get it stuck in your head what weight you want to be and that's that.

    I know that when I started Cambridge, I wanted to be 13 stone. I had been 13 stone before and felt great.

    It wasn't until I got a fair bit under that did I realise that I had previously accept 2nd best (for me anyway).

    What I had done is decide on a weight that would make me feel I was a slimmer overweight person. There really is nothing wrong with that, but I guess that I had subconsciously decided that I was never going to be 'normal' just wouldn't be possible...too big boned...not in my genes...etc etc.

    Other people also expected me to stop when I was a slimmer overweight person. They too never pictured me as them.:rolleyes:

    When I got to 13 stone, I could see the possibility of being even slimmer, yet I was very happy at that 13 stone mark. I decided that I needed to 'try' another weight to see if it was even better ;)

    I decided to continue with Cambridge and I must say that I am very pleased I did. I say, it's a personal choice. My decision to lose more wasn't based on my BMI, just how I felt when I reached that 13 stone. I wanted to be sure that I wasn't just taking that 2nd prize IYKWIM
  14. KD

    KD Gone fishing

    Was Cambridge, now maintaining
    You don't want to look at todays. It's appauling :D:eek:
  15. Dancing

    Dancing Gold Member

    I know this isn't my thread but just want to say that this is exactly the argument I've been having with myself. I know that 12/12.7 is an easy option for me and I'd be settling for second prize. If I believed in myself 100% I'd go for 11/11.7lbs. I will continue to dwell on it as I begin my CD journey again on Monday :eek::):D
  16. KD

    KD Gone fishing

    Was Cambridge, now maintaining
    It is really hard to know exactly what is right for us, because we often have such a distorted view of ourselves anyway. Just never sure what is real.

    I couldn't believe it when I got under 13 stone. I just could see a whole new road of pretty colours ahead. A place that I had always discounted as impossible.

    Mind you, as I got closer to that BMI healthy mark, the diet was totally doing my head in. I couldn't stand it any longer.

    So in the end I didn't chose a goal weight, I chose a day. I just announced on the pink site (where I hung out;)) that Monday was goal day regardless of what I weighed :D

    Then monday I announced I was at goal :D
  17. great things

    great things Gold Member

    Start Weight:
    Current Weight:
    Goal Weight:
    CD 810
    i find bmi's annoying. i'm trying so hard to get under the 25 but it's starting to get more difficult the lower i go. i can hardly do more, i think anyway.

    i think that if you compared some prof sports people, their weight and height and calculated their bmi, not many would be normal!

    i'm 5ft 8in and my range is very low, i feel. i've managed to get to 11st 12lbs and i can see more is needed before i loose some lumps and bumps. however, when do you say that's it, no more, what if i get down another 5lbs and find that i've still got lumps and bumps and that it's never really going to shift from those spots and infact i just look too thin everywhere else?

    i've taken up running and have been doing around 16 miles a week - soon upping this though. my figure is taking on a more athletic look but i still need more off for my bmi!

    argh! it's so complicated. esp when to stop dieting. when is enough enough? when do you get to be happy with the way you look regardless of a few lumps and bumps?
  18. Avatar Advert

    Register an account for free to disable ads in threads!
  19. Hedgehog

    Hedgehog Gold Member

    I do want to be in the healthy range, I am happy now that I have hit 25 bmi but to be honest I am only focusing on bmi to keep my doctors from dragging it up every time I go in due to health problems I have which are aggrevated by weight! And they are I can already feel improvements having shifted 3 stone but its hard to hear when you are struggling to get the weight down. Now that I have achieved that I will box the next doctor that tries to gives me a lecture over it.

    But personally I want to get to a size 10, thats my ultimate goal, and the size I was happiest with in the past and the weight I was before my health issues started playing havoc with me. I thought that I would get to that by getting down to 9 and a half stone, but now I think I might just have to be content with a 12 as I dont think I want to go lower than that and I right now I am firmly a size 14 on the bottom for some reason when others of my height and weight are enjoying the 12s already :)
  20. Kitteh

    Kitteh Resident geek

    mine is about 1650.. :(

    x x
  21. Sez

    Sez has started again!!

    After reading all these replies, I think the general consensus is then, that we are after all, individuals and we will choose our own goals accorind to how we feel, look, our health etc.

    Thanks for your replies everyone. It has been os interesting to see & hear your opinions on this, and hey.... no-one shot me down after all!!
  22. abz

    abz Gold Member

    well i have set my target as 11st7 because i was a size 14 at that weight when i was younger and i didn't get below 11 then because i started to look gaunt. but that was when i was 17. so i could look great at a lighter weight, and i'm not sure whether people say i looked my best at a size 14 because they don't expect me to be able to get any lower... so my cdc said to get there and see what i thought at the time. and that puts my bmi in the very high 24s... so only just within the bracket.

    abz xx
Popular Forums
  1. is a weight loss support community helping each other on their weight loss journey. We have a multitude of forums, from Slimming World and Exante, to Success Stories. Click the logo at the top right to return to the forum home page at any time.

Share This Page