you will find that most diets say that it is not healthy to lose more than 2lb a week, also you will find alot of ppl on here who have done the diet and are back within a year. Because losing more than 2lb a week makes it easier for the weight to come back on.
That's actually not true. Don't believe everything you read on the web, a lot is outdated and just hearsay
The lastest reliable research proved that losing quickly doesn't make you put it on any quicker. Can't remember exactly where the details come from, but it was reported on the BBC news a couple of years ago, and the BBC are reknowned worldwide for their reliability for facts.
You do not need to read to know that 3500 cals a week cant be good for you, its starvation.
The majority of good diets state that you should not go under 1100 calories a day.
There are two main reasons for this. The biggest one is that it is very hard to get all the vitamins and minerals in 1100 (something that Cambridge and LL manage to do). The other reason is that you go into starvation mode and will put the weight back on quickly as your metabolism slows. Going straight back to normal eating will produce a temporary gain.
Of course with Cambridge and LL, this doesn't happen if you do everything as they recommend and increase the food gradually as stated in the literature.
Cambridge is the most researched diet in the world (I believe) It has been shown to be a healthy way to lose weight...
if you follow it correctly.
I'm not saying AAM is not a good thing however the way i see it is each to their own. Plus Coley may be a CDC but she is not my CDC, i am more than satisfied with the advice that my CDC gives me.
If your CDC is giving you incorrect advice and you are happy with it, then that is up to you. It's your choice.
There again, if you go against the recommendations, then you can't really blame the diet if things go wrong.
I have to say, if I was the slightest bit worried about doing this diet, then I would be very quick to eat if the diets own recommendation were that I should