I've tried both, and I still do a bit of both to be honest, but as time goes on I'm veering towards S&S rather than Exante as I love the variety.
I can't really help you on the shakes, as I don't like shakes in 'real life'. The only skakes I have are the chocolate ones as a hot chocolate, and I think the S&S has the edge over Exante on taste.
The S&S 'meals' are really what sells their diet to me, I love the chilli con carne, the mushroom pasta, the macaroni cheese, and the spaghetti bolognese, and I have them all with some of the allowed vegetables.
Exante works on the basis of 3 products per day, where as S&S is 4 a day, or 3 plus a protein meal, and there's a vegetable allowance which is optional. I find that having the variety, and the option to add in a protein really works for me, and I know that many people find it a far more flexible VLCD than Exante.
Both diets are roughly the same calories, and you will be in ketosis with either one.
Hope this helps!
x
Hi I have in the past done exante and im just so sic of the pack so fancy a change and wondered if anyone has tried both and what the main difference was? are the carb low enough to put you in to ketosis?? are they really sweet??![]()
My biggest regret is not finding S&S sooner and being very miserable on a mere 3 shakes a day for a 10 week stretch when there are easier options out there!
Hi, just to put the other side to this I've been doing Exante mostly but bought a few s&s meals to add variety. I found that once I introduced the meal packs and veg whilst yes it did add variety and alleviate the boredom, it did mean I started to eat more off plan. First just extra chicken and veg/salad but then this led to other bits and pieces and my losses slowed - as you'd expect. I'm now going back on 100% Exante to boost my losses.
Whilst I know that for many the variety of s&s and the option of mealpacks means they are less likely to cheat, for me it seemed to mean that I was more likely to cheat once some food was allowed.
I also much prefer the Exante shakes and the Exante bars - they are both much more filling than s&s. The bars in particular are much bigger but then they are more calories (only 3 Exante packs v 4 s&s). Lastly I think Exante works out cheaper because you do only need to have 3 a day, although there is less flexibility in how you can order the products.
I hope your diet works for you whatever you decide. Just wanted to put the other side!
Don't have regrets as it will have helped you. I did LT for 16 weeks (years ago) and survived on just choc shakes until I couldn't handle it anymore and I moved to calorie counting (S&S wasn't around then). I did manage to shift 5 stone though in that time so I had no regrets even if it was difficult sometimes. This time round I found S&S an absolute breeze compared to LT and I'm sure that being on LT has helped hugely with that. When people post that following S&S is difficult I find myself thinking "you sure - try LT!".
LOL! Maximum respect to you Bordersgirl, 16 weeks on choc shake aloneand LT at that!! Totally agree im finding S&S a breeze too compared to other VLCD ive tried over the years. x
I think I could stay on this diet forever to be honest but I might get a bit thin (well I can dream![]()
).
and said:Yep - I've never managed more than 5 weeks on LT... I also dislike all the flavours except the chocolate but I always used to get 1-2 straw, vanilla or soup per week just to have a change lol.
Soup crisps were a godsend this time![]()