This sounds bad, and I know I'm cheating but I've been using them as my Healthy Extra B, without adding syns. So far, in the two weeks of having them, that hasn't affected me at all, but it would be nice if I did know how I should syn them.
JmeSaunders said:Thanks ermintrude, but this is still confusing. Normal Weetabix is a healthy extra. If I work out what it is for Weetabix with Golden Syrup, I'll also be adding in the syns for the Weetabix as well as.
Thanks ermintrude, but this is still confusing. Normal Weetabix is a healthy extra. If I work out what it is for Weetabix with Golden Syrup, I'll also be adding in the syns for the Weetabix as well as.
JmeSaunders said:Oh My God. So it doesn't work like the chocolate then? Where it's a healthy extra and you add on the few syns?
JmeSaunders said:Ah. This upsets me more than you can believe. This means I've been having 8 more syns than I realised, but it didn't affect my weight loss, I was losing more than I thought I would be. Thank you both for your help.
MummyEm said:I have the choc weetabix and it is on the online list of Hexb+2syns, did dissapear for while but seems its back, the golden syrup one is very new so it may appear on the list in time, or it may not
I have the choc weetabix and it is on the online list of Hexb+2syns, did dissapear for while but seems its back, the golden syrup one is very new so it may appear on the list in time, or it may not
Ah right, hadn't realised it was back x
Just an idea?
If you really like the golden syrup one, I would be inclined to look at the cal difference say there is 40 cals difference for 2 bisc (I dont know by the way) from the normal weetabix but the same fibre etc. I would then call it a hex b plus 2 syns going by the 20 cals a syn rule.
I know thats not technically correct but that is what I would do.I dont think you would be far out.