eyeontheprize
can see the end in sight!
That was about beth dittos range btw!
But the companies aren't really responsible though are they? The average woman is a size 16 and that's what they go up to
Yeah but if 16 is the average size then there are of course people above and below that size. They cater for people below the average; they should do the same for people above it, and not set the average as a maximum...
I guess these shops are trying to project a certain image - therefore only go up to a certain size?
It feels like the 'big' stores like Evans capitalise on your lack of choice. They know they can charge high prices, because what are your options? and I agree, they don't always have fashionable ranges and a broad choice, and the assumption is that because you're shopping for bigger sizes you want a tent, not something tailored. Or pretty. Or funky.
If you do manage to find trousers in a bigger size in a 'normal' shop the leg lengths can be ridiculous. I have quite long legs so standard length jeans look like i'm preparing for the floods! I dont want the bottom of my jeans round my ankles! Not a good look! I agree they should cater for the above average and not take the average as the maximum size. And don't even get me started on the H&M sizings!
Yeah but if 16 is the average size then there are of course people above and below that size. They cater for people below the average; they should do the same for people above it, and not set the average as a maximum...