I know people have very strong views (both sides) on this but personally I'm more than a little confused.
I've never tweaked; in the respect that I only ever use foods for their intended purpose. However, where is the line? Things like lasagne crisps, chick pea nuts and smash cakes are all quite obviously tweaks.. But what about 'kfc' chicken made with smash? Or smash scones? Or smash pizza?
Our group had a visit from the area manager recently and I asked her the above question. She maintains that if a food still has 'satisfying value' then it isn't a tweak: as in, if it's part of a meal and you would have used that food product in some form on that meal anyway then it isn't a tweak. I STILL take issue with this. If I made a smash pizza and had it with salad and SW chips then I'm having twice as much potato as I would normally be expected to have.
Perhaps I am over thinking it.. I often do.. But I'd be interested to read other people's thoughts on this.
I've never tweaked; in the respect that I only ever use foods for their intended purpose. However, where is the line? Things like lasagne crisps, chick pea nuts and smash cakes are all quite obviously tweaks.. But what about 'kfc' chicken made with smash? Or smash scones? Or smash pizza?
Our group had a visit from the area manager recently and I asked her the above question. She maintains that if a food still has 'satisfying value' then it isn't a tweak: as in, if it's part of a meal and you would have used that food product in some form on that meal anyway then it isn't a tweak. I STILL take issue with this. If I made a smash pizza and had it with salad and SW chips then I'm having twice as much potato as I would normally be expected to have.
Perhaps I am over thinking it.. I often do.. But I'd be interested to read other people's thoughts on this.