That's fair enough although as I said before there is no case law so it will be interesting to see what the outcome would be if anyone does decide its worth a punt with a clever lawyer. Then it wouldn't be us who decides. Just because it's a business does not exempt SW from such a challenge - as far as I am aware. I'm not expert but there have been plenty of cases of indirect discrimination (setting out a policy or procedure which - on the face of it - treats people the same but by doing so disadvantages certain groups of people) which people have not seen it as discrimination but the courts have ruled otherwise. At the moment it's academic until when/ if someone decides to challenge. And as you say, Starlight, it maybe that no one ever does.